The following opinion is reprinted from the Christian Science Monitor. It is expresses very clearly how I feel about the current debate on Health Insurance.
Enjoy
Tuesday, June 16, 2009
The Private Health Industry's time is up!
Opinion
The private health industry's time is up
Obama has been supportive of a public option, but how do you solve the healthcare problem when you fail to deal with its root?
By Bernie Sanders
from the June 16, 2009 edition
Washington - President Obama has indicated he wants a healthcare bill on his desk sometime around October, before we worry about timetables, however, we as a nation have to answer two very fundamental questions.
First, should all Americans be entitled to healthcare in the same way we respond to other basic needs such as education, police, and fire protection? Second, if we are to provide quality healthcare to all, how do we accomplish that in the most cost-effective way?
The answer to the first question is pretty clear, and one of the reasons that Barack Obama was elected president. Most Americans believe that all of us should have healthcare coverage, and that nobody should be left out of the system. The real debate is how we accomplish that goal in an affordable and sustainable way.
To me, the evidence is overwhelming that we must end the private insurance company domination of healthcare in our country and move toward a publicly funded, single-payer, Medicare-for-all approach.
Our current private health insurance system is the most costly, wasteful, complicated, and bureaucratic in the world. But in America, the people who have to navigate that maze are the lucky ones. Today, 46 million people have no health insurance and even more are underinsured with high deductibles and co-payments. At a time when 60 million people, including many with insurance, do not have access to a medical home base, more than 18,000 Americans die every year from preventable illnesses. That is six times the number who died in the 9/11 terrorist attacks.
Despite the fact that we spend almost twice as much per person on healthcare as any other country, our healthcare outcomes lag behind many other nations. According to the World Health Organization, the United States ranks 37th in terms of health system performance and we are far behind many other countries in terms of such important indices as infant mortality, life expectancy, and preventable deaths.
The main reason we get such bad results is that the function of private health insurance companies is not to provide quality healthcare for all, but to make huge profits for those who own the companies. With thousands of different health benefit programs designed to maximize profits, private health insurance companies spend an incredible 30 percent of each healthcare dollar on administration and billing, exorbitant CEO compensation packages, advertising, lobbying, and campaign contributions. Public programs like Medicare, Medicaid, and the department of Veterans Affairs are administered for far less.
In recent years, while we have experienced an acute shortage of primary healthcare doctors as well as nurses and dentists, we are paying for a huge increase in healthcare bureaucrats and bill collectors. Over the past three decades, the number of administrative personnel has grown by 25 times the number of physicians.
While healthcare costs are soaring, it should surprise no one that profits of private health insurance companies are more than keeping pace.
From 2003 to 2007, the combined profits of the nation's major health insurance companies increased by 170 percent. And, while more and more Americans are losing their jobs and health insurance, the top executives in the industry are receiving lavish compensation packages.
It's not just William McGuire, the former head of United Health, who several years ago accumulated stock options worth an estimated $1.6 billion, or Cigna CEO Edward Hanway who made more than $120 million in the past five years. The reality is that CEO compensation for the top health insurance companies now averages $14.2 million.
The president has been supportive of a public option – a plan that people could opt into if they are uninsured or don't like their private coverage. But the situation is extremely fluid. How do you get to the root of a problem when you fail to take on the private health industry?
The time is now for our nation to address the most profound moral and economic issue we face. The time is now for our country to join the rest of the industrialized world and provide cost-effective, comprehensive, quality healthcare to every man, woman, and child in our country. The time is now to take on the powerful special interests in the insurance and pharmaceutical industries and pass a single-payer national healthcare program.
Bernie Sanders is an independent senator for Vermont and a member of the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee.
The private health industry's time is up
Obama has been supportive of a public option, but how do you solve the healthcare problem when you fail to deal with its root?
By Bernie Sanders
from the June 16, 2009 edition
Washington - President Obama has indicated he wants a healthcare bill on his desk sometime around October, before we worry about timetables, however, we as a nation have to answer two very fundamental questions.
First, should all Americans be entitled to healthcare in the same way we respond to other basic needs such as education, police, and fire protection? Second, if we are to provide quality healthcare to all, how do we accomplish that in the most cost-effective way?
The answer to the first question is pretty clear, and one of the reasons that Barack Obama was elected president. Most Americans believe that all of us should have healthcare coverage, and that nobody should be left out of the system. The real debate is how we accomplish that goal in an affordable and sustainable way.
To me, the evidence is overwhelming that we must end the private insurance company domination of healthcare in our country and move toward a publicly funded, single-payer, Medicare-for-all approach.
Our current private health insurance system is the most costly, wasteful, complicated, and bureaucratic in the world. But in America, the people who have to navigate that maze are the lucky ones. Today, 46 million people have no health insurance and even more are underinsured with high deductibles and co-payments. At a time when 60 million people, including many with insurance, do not have access to a medical home base, more than 18,000 Americans die every year from preventable illnesses. That is six times the number who died in the 9/11 terrorist attacks.
Despite the fact that we spend almost twice as much per person on healthcare as any other country, our healthcare outcomes lag behind many other nations. According to the World Health Organization, the United States ranks 37th in terms of health system performance and we are far behind many other countries in terms of such important indices as infant mortality, life expectancy, and preventable deaths.
The main reason we get such bad results is that the function of private health insurance companies is not to provide quality healthcare for all, but to make huge profits for those who own the companies. With thousands of different health benefit programs designed to maximize profits, private health insurance companies spend an incredible 30 percent of each healthcare dollar on administration and billing, exorbitant CEO compensation packages, advertising, lobbying, and campaign contributions. Public programs like Medicare, Medicaid, and the department of Veterans Affairs are administered for far less.
In recent years, while we have experienced an acute shortage of primary healthcare doctors as well as nurses and dentists, we are paying for a huge increase in healthcare bureaucrats and bill collectors. Over the past three decades, the number of administrative personnel has grown by 25 times the number of physicians.
While healthcare costs are soaring, it should surprise no one that profits of private health insurance companies are more than keeping pace.
From 2003 to 2007, the combined profits of the nation's major health insurance companies increased by 170 percent. And, while more and more Americans are losing their jobs and health insurance, the top executives in the industry are receiving lavish compensation packages.
It's not just William McGuire, the former head of United Health, who several years ago accumulated stock options worth an estimated $1.6 billion, or Cigna CEO Edward Hanway who made more than $120 million in the past five years. The reality is that CEO compensation for the top health insurance companies now averages $14.2 million.
The president has been supportive of a public option – a plan that people could opt into if they are uninsured or don't like their private coverage. But the situation is extremely fluid. How do you get to the root of a problem when you fail to take on the private health industry?
The time is now for our nation to address the most profound moral and economic issue we face. The time is now for our country to join the rest of the industrialized world and provide cost-effective, comprehensive, quality healthcare to every man, woman, and child in our country. The time is now to take on the powerful special interests in the insurance and pharmaceutical industries and pass a single-payer national healthcare program.
Bernie Sanders is an independent senator for Vermont and a member of the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee.
Tuesday, April 21, 2009
Obama's 100 Days
As we approach the media created milestone of 100 days, I can't help but to stop and reflect on these past few months and the tremendous amount of energy and effort expended by our new President. Although I favored John McCain, I don't think that Senator McCain would have or could have begun his presidency with the vigour and effectiveness of Barack Obama.
I am unsure of some of his decision but Obama won the election fair and square, (yes I do believe he has a mandate). There is one thing to win power, another is the ability to use power. President Obama has shown that he ready and able to wield all the power given to him by the constitution and the people.
In many ways I am overwhelmed by the pace, The bailout money, a new very expensive budget, the international trips, reaching out to Cuba and Iran, removing the roadblocks to better science, and maintaining a connection with his constituents and most importantly his family. I wish I had that energy. Can we bottle it?
There is no doubt that the economic situation is unprecedented and the measures to fix it must be equally bold. Once the structural problems are corrected in the credit markets, the real work of changing the psychology of the investors and consumers will be the biggest task. Obama can do that.
We are creative beings and we will create a resolution. We may err in that resolution but again we can create a resolution for that. We have been doing this for millennia.
I for one am excited and proud that we have someone in the Oval Office who is not afraid to do the job he was elected to do and has the will to make it happen. I feel confident in our future.
I am unsure of some of his decision but Obama won the election fair and square, (yes I do believe he has a mandate). There is one thing to win power, another is the ability to use power. President Obama has shown that he ready and able to wield all the power given to him by the constitution and the people.
In many ways I am overwhelmed by the pace, The bailout money, a new very expensive budget, the international trips, reaching out to Cuba and Iran, removing the roadblocks to better science, and maintaining a connection with his constituents and most importantly his family. I wish I had that energy. Can we bottle it?
There is no doubt that the economic situation is unprecedented and the measures to fix it must be equally bold. Once the structural problems are corrected in the credit markets, the real work of changing the psychology of the investors and consumers will be the biggest task. Obama can do that.
We are creative beings and we will create a resolution. We may err in that resolution but again we can create a resolution for that. We have been doing this for millennia.
I for one am excited and proud that we have someone in the Oval Office who is not afraid to do the job he was elected to do and has the will to make it happen. I feel confident in our future.
Friday, September 03, 2004
Is the country truly devided?
I continually hear the media proclaiming that the country is devided between Democrats and Republicans, conservatives versus liberals. They could not be further from the truth. What I have witnessed over the years is that the electorate is neither conservative nor liberal but a combination of both. In fact I believe that the country is becoming more unified. What we witness in the news are the views of the extremists and dinasaurs of the past and the great majority is ignored.
If any one of the political pundits sat down in a bar or in the livingroom of a typical American home, they would find that we all have differing views on the critical issues facing our country.
If you asked me how I feel about 10 key issues you could not pin me down to either party.
1) Gun control- I believe that we need more gun control. Liberal
2) I support the notion of Gay marriage-Liberal
3) I believe that Abortion is murder - Conservative
4) I believe that tax cuts are good for economic growth - Conservative
5) On the issue of Iraq? We need to deal with our enemies BEFORE they attack us, rather than wait to be attacked.- Conservative
6) Health Care-I believe that we need some sort of basic catastrophic health care system and a strong preventive health care program nationally funded.- Liberal
The above is just a sampling of the schitzophrenic thinking that I believe permeates the American political culture.
I am torn in this election. On the issues of Iraq, national security and the economy, I am completely behind our President.
On the issues of health care, gay rights, and supreme court appointments, I prefer John Kerry. The country is not devided, all of us are divided internally and during the past few months I have vacilated between Bush and Kerry. I don't know how I will end up voting.
If any one of the political pundits sat down in a bar or in the livingroom of a typical American home, they would find that we all have differing views on the critical issues facing our country.
If you asked me how I feel about 10 key issues you could not pin me down to either party.
1) Gun control- I believe that we need more gun control. Liberal
2) I support the notion of Gay marriage-Liberal
3) I believe that Abortion is murder - Conservative
4) I believe that tax cuts are good for economic growth - Conservative
5) On the issue of Iraq? We need to deal with our enemies BEFORE they attack us, rather than wait to be attacked.- Conservative
6) Health Care-I believe that we need some sort of basic catastrophic health care system and a strong preventive health care program nationally funded.- Liberal
The above is just a sampling of the schitzophrenic thinking that I believe permeates the American political culture.
I am torn in this election. On the issues of Iraq, national security and the economy, I am completely behind our President.
On the issues of health care, gay rights, and supreme court appointments, I prefer John Kerry. The country is not devided, all of us are divided internally and during the past few months I have vacilated between Bush and Kerry. I don't know how I will end up voting.
Monday, July 26, 2004
What to expect!
I will write about the things that inspire me most. I do have a background in politics. But as I said, I am not be holden to any Dogma, religious or political. I will be watching and reading the news. When I see important information, I will post. My goal is to ASK QUESTIONS. In the arena of politics, there is the Republincan side and the Democratic side. I am interested in the the truth which I call the "Third Side."
Introduction
I am brand new at "blogging." I don't even know what it means or how it started but I think that it is the beginning of the new world order. Gosh, what a statement!
A couple of years ago, there was a documentary on some cable channel that listed the 1000 most important people of the last millenium. Many of the top 100 are well known; Albert Einstein, FDR, RWR, Galileo, Newton, Loyala, and for worse Hitler and Stalin. The writers decided that Guttenburg was the most impotant person of the Millenium. I was both surprised and after thinking it through impressed. The argument was that Guttenburg's invention of the printing press was the catalyst for the spread of information that changed the world.
Prior to Guttenburg. information was controlled by and large by the Roman Catholic Church. In their world, the church was the "Truth" the Pope was infallable and what came down from the pulpit was the word of God. I don't know anything about Guttenburg, other than that he first started printing copies of the the Bible. Jerry Falwell would be proud!
But the significance of this invention was truly phenominal. For the first time in the long history of mankind, we had an opportuniity to "say something" and have it distributed to as many people as we can physcally reach.
Now almost 1500 years later, we can now reach as many people as can find our website. 1500 YEARS! That is a hell of a long time. What happened in the interim? We relied on the emergence of the "PRESS." The printed media that began following Guttenburg's invention, and eventually led to radio and then television. That sitll took over1500 YEARS!
We had been subject to recieving information through the filter of the "NEWS" media. And they have done an admirable job. Certainly imperfect at worst, the profesional news organizations have attempted to develop the processes necessary to deliver accurate and unbiased news. Thank you Johan Guttenburg.
Now, with the invention of the internet, it is the time for all of us to add to the social discourse and contribute to the information revolution. I, for one feel that now I may add something to world thought, as small as my voice is.
For all of you that are participating in this new, exciting revolution; read, listen, think and respond. I am convinced that we as an interested and caring people will search out the truth and find real answers to the worlds problems! I am so excited!
A couple of years ago, there was a documentary on some cable channel that listed the 1000 most important people of the last millenium. Many of the top 100 are well known; Albert Einstein, FDR, RWR, Galileo, Newton, Loyala, and for worse Hitler and Stalin. The writers decided that Guttenburg was the most impotant person of the Millenium. I was both surprised and after thinking it through impressed. The argument was that Guttenburg's invention of the printing press was the catalyst for the spread of information that changed the world.
Prior to Guttenburg. information was controlled by and large by the Roman Catholic Church. In their world, the church was the "Truth" the Pope was infallable and what came down from the pulpit was the word of God. I don't know anything about Guttenburg, other than that he first started printing copies of the the Bible. Jerry Falwell would be proud!
But the significance of this invention was truly phenominal. For the first time in the long history of mankind, we had an opportuniity to "say something" and have it distributed to as many people as we can physcally reach.
Now almost 1500 years later, we can now reach as many people as can find our website. 1500 YEARS! That is a hell of a long time. What happened in the interim? We relied on the emergence of the "PRESS." The printed media that began following Guttenburg's invention, and eventually led to radio and then television. That sitll took over1500 YEARS!
We had been subject to recieving information through the filter of the "NEWS" media. And they have done an admirable job. Certainly imperfect at worst, the profesional news organizations have attempted to develop the processes necessary to deliver accurate and unbiased news. Thank you Johan Guttenburg.
Now, with the invention of the internet, it is the time for all of us to add to the social discourse and contribute to the information revolution. I, for one feel that now I may add something to world thought, as small as my voice is.
For all of you that are participating in this new, exciting revolution; read, listen, think and respond. I am convinced that we as an interested and caring people will search out the truth and find real answers to the worlds problems! I am so excited!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
